The Spheres:

What is feeling?

Language & thought cannot define feeling.

Recognizing & with respect to the dualistic apparent limitation of thought and therein of language in this regard, what is the ‘best’ pointing, to ‘feeling’?

Infinite & unconditional.

Actual & real.

Reality as it is.

If reality is me, and I am unconditional - why don’t I feel it? Why don’t I feel like I am unconditional?

Being is obscured by the apparent activity of thinking, thoughts, beliefs - conditions. Self inquire as to the feeling of being me.

Question the thought “I”, which is said to be separate of, and therein implied to not be, feeling.

(See Self Inquiry, Self Referential Thoughts & Subject-Object Thoughts)

That’s crazy. That’s such a crazy thing to say. People are going to think you’re crazy.

The conceptualization of unconditional is collective conditioning (and not even) and is the root of all mental illness, bodily dis-ease and worldly conflict.

As Jesus said, “forgive them, for they know not what they do”.

(See video There is No Thinker of Thoughts, and The Emotional Scale)

That’s crazy! If this “pointing” is to what is actual, to truth - again, why don’t I feel it? It seems like if I am UNCONDITIONAL, then certainly, I would feel - unconditional! What gives? Can you ‘point’ as simply and as straightforward as possible?

The thoughts which arise to the contrary are beliefs, conditions, and are what obscures the truth.

(See Videos: Actuality of Being, How You Create Your Reality Part 1, How You Create Your Reality Part 2: Emotion & Creator Creating Creation, and How You Create Your Reality Part 3: Relationships, Communion & The Dreamboard)

How so?

This is what is meant by ‘being on the path’, (vs conceptualizing).

Spirituality as the investigation of what is true, actual, ineffable, undefinable, incommunicable, unthinkable, unbelievable, and eternally unchanging under any & all circumstances - absolute.

When beliefs are inspected, beliefs are dispelled - and only what is actual, absolute & unchanging, that which ‘The Truth’ points to, remains.

(See Meditation and Self Inquiry)

But if all there is, is unconditional - it only makes sense that if this were true, I would only be feeling unconditional.

You are not per se feeling unconditional, you are already unconditional.

Unconditional is appearing as the two spheres.

The implied twoness, or, duality, of there being a “me” and unconditional, is a thought, a condition which you, unconditional, are appearing as.

The path is backwards (in a sense). ‘Go’ prior to thoughts, prior to beliefs. Prior to the belief you were born, prior to the belief there was experience - before there was - experience. As in, it is commonly believed there was a world already underway, an experience - which you were born into. However, your direct experience & intuition say otherwise.

Apparent words, language & communication imply there is a ‘you’, a ‘separate self’, an ‘individual’, a ‘knower of’, an ‘understander of’. An intellectual intellectualizing, a knower knowing, an understander understanding. An illusion, in truth, never actually happened. That is what an illusion is. Something seemed to happen, which in actuality - didn’t.

(See Going Prior and I am)

So, the ‘path’ is seeing past the relative, the knowing, the understanding… and then feeling - the absolute?

You are already prior to.

Enlightenment is, yet no one ‘becomes’ enlightened. Awakening is, yet no one awakens, experiences awakening or awakenings, or is awake.

Without beliefs to the contrary, enlightenment, unconditional, is what is already actual and unmistakably radiant.

Consider this analogy…

The sun is always illuminated, shining brightly. Yet as clouds roll in, it can seem as if the sun is not shining or not shining as brightly. The clouds are like thoughts believed, which are obscure the light. The light is not ‘more illuminated’ or ‘less illuminated’. The light is more obscured or less obscured.

(See video: What is a Referential Thought)

This can be likened to a tablet and wifi. Though the wifi is unseen, unheard, and untouched, the wifi is nevertheless, present.

Wifi, which appears as a tablet, would therein also appear as the processor and computations of the tablet. This ‘processing’ is essentially, one’s and zero’s, apparent duality - the activity of thinking, which is inherently, and apparently, dualistic.

The tablet, which is only a vibrational appearance of the wifi, veils the wifi from the fact that it is the wifi, by believing the computations, which are the dualistic one’s and zero’s, which is the appearance of, the wifi. It is not “the tablet” which is ‘veiled’ by the ‘processing’ - it’s the wifi - and thus it is not that ‘the tablet’ ‘becomes enlightened’ or ‘awakens’. The unchanging wifi is simply unfettered, unobscured.

Only in the cessation of these ‘computations’, and the end of the wifi believing therein that it is a tablet, is it clear that all tablets & computations (thoughts) come & go, and therein in truth, there are no tablets, processors nor computations. There is only the wifi, which appears as such.

The ‘computations’ could be - ‘my wifi’, ‘my emotions’, ‘my love’, or ‘absolute & relative’, or even ‘my computations’ (‘my’ thoughts). All of these computations would be apparent, and not of the tablet, as the tablet is no more than the appearance of, the wifi.

Again, the “tablet” could not and would never realize this, as the tablet is a vibrational appearance, and not a ‘thing’ which ‘realizes’. Only the wifi is the wifi, and no computation is needed for the wifi to be - the wifi.

More computations thus would not, and could not, in regard to wifi-recognition, ‘do’ what “the tablets” allowing of the settling of the activity of computations, could ‘do’.

Only the wifi allowing the activity of computing & believing to settle, and realizing that the wifi is wifi, will ‘do’.